• Fair Warning IP, LLC v. Iatric Systems, Inc.

    Fair Warning IP, LLC v. Iatric Systems, Inc.

    Fair Warning IP, LLC v. Iatric Systems, Inc., 2015-1985 Read Fair Warning IP, LLC v. Iatric Systems, Inc., 2015-1985 In an infringement suit involving a patent that discloses ways to detect fraud and misuse by identifying unusual patterns in users’ access of sensitive data, the District Court’s dismissal of suit... Continue reading

     
  • Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

    Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

    Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 2015-1171 Read Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 2015-1171 In an infringement and countersuit between Apple and Samsung involving patents for mobile phone devices, the District Court’s a) grant of summary judgment that Samsung’s accused devices infringe Apple’s ‘172 patent, b) denial... Continue reading

     
  • Smith v. Barnesandnoble.com, LLC

    Smith v. Barnesandnoble.com, LLC

    Smith v. Barnesandnoble.com, LLC, 15-3508 Read Smith v. Barnesandnoble.com, LLC, 15-3508 In a suit alleging direct and contributory copyright infringement by defendant Barnesandnoble.com, which, under license, uploads books and book samples to digital ‘lockers’ that the defendant maintains for its individual customers, and when the license granted by plaintiff was... Continue reading

     
  • Intellectual Ventures I, LLP v. Symantec Corp.

    Intellectual Ventures I, LLP v. Symantec Corp.

    Intellectual Ventures I, LLP v. Symantec Corp., 2015-1769 Read Intellectual Ventures I, LLP v. Symantec Corp., 2015-1769 In an infringement action involving patents directed to methods of screening emails and other data files for unwanted content, the District Court’s judgment that certain asserted claims of the ‘050 patent and the... Continue reading

     
  • Lyda v. CBS Corp.

    Lyda v. CBS Corp.

    Lyda v. CBS Corp., 2015-1923 Read Lyda v. CBS Corp., 2015-1923 In an infringement action involving a patent , the District Court’s dismissal of the complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is affirmed where: 1) Form 18 does not apply to a claim of joint patent infringement; and... Continue reading

     
  • Drone Technologies, Inc. v. Parrot, S.A.

    Drone Technologies, Inc. v. Parrot, S.A.

    Drone Technologies, Inc. v. Parrot, S.A., 2015-1892 Read Drone Technologies, Inc. v. Parrot, S.A., 2015-1892 In an infringement action involving patents directed to systems for remotely controlled machines, the District Court’s judgment and damage award to plaintiff is: 1) vacated where he district court abused its discretion in issuing the... Continue reading

     
  • De Fontbrune v. Wofsy

    De Fontbrune v. Wofsy

    De Fontbrune v. Wofsy, 14-15790 Read De Fontbrune v. Wofsy, 14-15790 In an action seeking to protect plaintiff’s copyright in photographs of Pablo Picasso’s artworks, and to enforce a French judgment of two million euros in astreinte in federal court against defendant-American art editor under the California Uniform Foreign-Court Monetary... Continue reading

     
  • Affinity Labs of Texas, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.

    Affinity Labs of Texas, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc.

    Affinity Labs of Texas, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc., 2015-2080 Read Affinity Labs of Texas, Inc. v. Amazon.com Inc., 2015-2080 In a patent infringement action involving a patent directed to a ‘method for targeted advertising’ in which an advertisement is selected for delivery to the user of a portable device based... Continue reading

     
  • Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corp.

    Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corp.

    Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corp., 2015-1605 Read Server Technology, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corp., 2015-1605 In an infringement action involving patents related to intelligent power distribution units (PDUs) that digitally display the amount of power being drawn, the District Court’s adoption of a jury’s advisory verdict... Continue reading

     
  • Cox Communications Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co. LP

    Cox Communications Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co. LP

    Cox Communications Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co. LP, 2016-1013 Read Cox Communications Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co. LP, 2016-1013 In an infringement action involving patents that relate to developments in voice-over-IP technology, the District Court’s judgment that the claims are are invalid as indefinite under 35 U.S.C. section 112 is... Continue reading

     
 
 
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com