OPUS IP
      
 
  • Home
  • ABOUT OPUS IP
  • PROTECTION
  • IP OFFICES
  • UKIPO
  • NEWS/UPDATES
  • RECENT HEARINGS
  • PATENTS
  • TRADEMARKS
  • DESIGNS
  • UK IPEC DECISIONS
  • EPO
  • NEWS/UPDATES
  • APPEAL DECISIONS
  • G/XX DECISIONS 2010-2019
  • G/XX DECISIONS 2000-2009
  • G/XX DECISIONS 1990-2000
  • G/XX DECISIONS PRE-1990
  • J/XX APPEALS 2010-2019
  • J/XX APPEALS 2000-2009
  • J/XX APPEALS 1990-2000
  • J/XX APPEALS PRE-1990
  • T/XXXX APPEALS 2010-2019
  • T/XXXX APPEALS 2000-2009
  • T/XXXX APPEALS 1990-1999
  • T/XXXX APPEALS pre-1990
  • WIPO – PCT/MADRID/HAGUE
  • NEWS/UPDATES
  • PCT NEWSLETTER
  • PATENTS NEWS
  • TREATY MODIFICATIONS
  • MADRID SYSTEM (TM)
  • HAGUE SYSTEM (DESIGNS)
  • PATENTSCOPE/SEARCHING
  • USPTO
  • NEWS/UPDATES
  • GENERAL
  • PATENTS
  • TRADEMARKS
  • COPYRIGHT
  • EUIPO
  • NEWS/UPDATES
  • SEARCH CASES (EXTERNAL)
  • IP NEWS/LINKS
  • LINKS TO IP RESOURCES
  • SITE
  • LOG-IN
 

Board of Appeal decision on plant patentability published

6th February 2019

http://www.epo.org/news-issues/news/2019/20190205.html
Content reproduced from the Website of the European Patent Office as permitted by their terms of use.

05 February 2019

Today, the EPO was informed that in case
T1063/18 regarding the patentability of plants a decision has been
issued by the competent Technical Board of Appeal. The written decision can be accessed on the website section of
the Boards of Appeals of the EPO.

The case is related to a decision by an Examining
Division of the EPO to refuse a European patent application related to pepper
plants on grounds that the invention could not be patented under Rule 28 (2)
EPC. The decision of the EPO to refuse the patent application was appealed by
the patent applicant.

The Technical Board of Appeal set the EPO’s decision
aside and remitted the case back to the patent examiners for further
consideration. The Technical Board of Appeal stated inter alia that Rule 28(2) EPC “could not be
interpreted in such a way that it was not in conflict in conflict” with Article
53(b) EPC as interpreted by the Enlarged Board of Appeal in decisions G 2/12
and G 2/13.

Further information

  • Communication
    from the Boards of Appeal: “Written decision in case
    T 1063/18 on the patentability of
    plants issued”

 
 
 
 

OPUS IP on X (formerly Twitter)…

Twitter feed is not available at the moment.
 
 
 

RSS RECENT PATENT NEWS…

  • Oura Sues Ultrahuman (Again) To Block Its Latest Smart Ring From The US Market - Engadget
  • Protecting the patent system that powers MD’s biotech future - Maryland Daily Record
  • Universal files patent for AI-powered personalised ride systems - Blooloop
  • H6 files US patent application, invoice processing at €30 million since January - Times of Malta
 
 

RSS UK BUSINESS NEWS…

  • What is the Budget and what could be in it?
  • The Indian workers filming their work to train AI
  • Lights will stay on this winter, grid operator says after concerns
  • Renting in London - 'I pay £2,000 for one bedroom'
 
 
 

Designed by Industrial Action

Copyright © 2026 OPUS IP Limited. All Rights Reserved

OPUS IP Limited: COMPANY & OTHER LEGAL INFORMATION