OPUS IP – A COMPOSITION FOR YOUR IDEAS

At OPUS IP, we are as passionate about your ideas as you are, and it is our aim, as much as it is yours, to see them succeed.

However, where others in our field may be similarly passionate, few are as capable, particularly when it comes to expressing and capturing those ideas with the written word. It is our intricate blend of drafting prowess and scientific and technological understanding of your ideas which distinguishes us from others.

In addition to our technical capabilities, we provide a service which is responsive, enthusiastic and acutely practical. Not only do we understand your technology, we understand your commercial requirements, and how important IP can be in advancing them. We believe your IP should be as practical as the ideas, developments and improvements it protects.

IP can be a complex subject, and we aim to demystify it by providing practical advice which is comprehensible and commercially astute.

If you seek a service of clarity, precision, practicality, and raw ability, then get in touch.

 
 

LATEST NEWS/UPDATES

  • Mark: Browns Est 2006 (Invalidity), UK00003235366, O/785/18

    Mark: Browns Est 2006 (Invalidity), UK00003235366, O/785/18

    BL Number O/785/18 Decision date 7 December 2018 Hearing Officer Ms E Venables Mark Browns Est 2006 Classes 30 Grounds Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3) Earlier Trade Marks – Composite word and device marks Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3) Earlier Trade Marks – Imperfect recollection Full decision O/785/18 166Kb https://www.ipo.gov.uk/t-challenge-decision-results/t-challenge-decision-results-bl?BL_Number=O/785/18 Content... Continue reading

     
  • Mark: Matchfit Conditioning (Opposition), UK00003261802, O/784/18

    Mark: Matchfit Conditioning (Opposition), UK00003261802, O/784/18

    BL Number O/784/18 Decision date 7 December 2018 Hearing Officer Ms C Boucher Mark Matchfit Conditioning Classes 41 Grounds Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3) Earlier Trade Marks – Distinctive and dominant components Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3) Earlier Trade Marks – Conceptual distinctions Sections 5(1), 5(2) and 5(3) Dilution Cases... Continue reading

     
  • Mark: Super Bubble Waffle (Opposition), UK00003234045, O/783/18

    Mark: Super Bubble Waffle (Opposition), UK00003234045, O/783/18

    BL Number O/783/18 Decision date 7 December 2018 Hearing Officer Ms R Harfield Mark Super Bubble Waffle Classes 43 Grounds Revocation / Proof of Use – Dates – use as a trade mark Revocation / Proof of Use – Variant forms of marks – use with another mark Full decision... Continue reading

     
  • Mastercard Applies For New Patent for Anonymous Blockchain Transactions – A Regulated Bitcoin Tumbler? – CCN

    Mastercard Applies For New Patent for Anonymous Blockchain Transactions – A Regulated Bitcoin Tumbler? – CCN

    Mastercard Applies For New Patent for Anonymous Blockchain Transactions – A Regulated Bitcoin Tumbler?  CCN Mastercard, the company who have gone through the entire process of laughing, fighting, and then embracing Bitcoin (and then attacking it again), have applied …

     
 
 
 

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – PRIMARY FORMS OF PROTECTION

 
 
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com